چهارشنبه 06 مرداد 1400
Home|About Culture House|Language Classes|Contact Us|Archived News|Sitemap
Azaan Timing


Sight seeing of Iran

Tomb Of Hafez, Shiraz

Amir Chakhmaq Square, Yazd

Safavid Dynasty (1501-1736)

While the Turkman dynasties ruled in Azarbayjan, Shaikh Ḥaydar headed a movement that had begun in the late 13th century as a Sufi order under his ancestor, Shaikh Safi-al-Din of Ardabil, who claimed descent from the Seventh Shai Imam, Musa al-Kaẓem. By the end of the 15th century, this Sufi order was turned into a militant movement with numerous followers, mainly from the Turkman tribesmen of Anatolia. They were called the Qizil-Bash, Red Heads, because of the distinctive red headgear that they had adopted to mark their adherence to the Safavids. With their helps, the Safavids conducted several successful military campaigns, especially in the Caucasus. By virtue of their descent from the Prophet’s family, the Safavid movement was invested with a semi-sacred character, and the religious character of the new claimants to the throne was particularly acceptable to the Persians.

Although Shaikh Ḥaydar was killed in one his battles in the Caucasus, his son Ismail avenged his death by conquering Azarbayjan and then the whole of Iran. In 1501, Ismail was proclaimed Shah Iran. He became the founder of one of the most brilliant ruling dynasties in Iranian history – the Safavids.

The Safavids declared Shai Islam the state religion and used proselytizing and force to convert the large majority of Muslims in Iran to the Shai sect. Their main external enemies were the Uzbeks and the Ottomans. The Uzbeks were an unstable element along Iran’s northeastern frontier, raiding Khorasan and blocking the Safavid advance northward into Transoxiana. The Ottomans, who were Sunnites, were rivals for the religious allegiance of Muslims in eastern Anatolia and Iraq and pressed territorial claims in both these areas and in the Caucasus. A series of battles between Iran and the Ottoman Turkey lasted throughout the reign of the Safavids.

Tahmasp, the eldest son and successor of Shah Esmaʿil, had none of his fathers’ appeal or personal courage. For a long period after coming to the throne, he was a pawn of powerful tribal leaders. He is remembered for the unusual length of his reign (fifty-two years), his treachery in selling his guest Bayazid, son of the Ottoman Sultan Soleyman the Magnificent, to his father in exchange for 400,000 pieces of gold, and for a mention (as “Bactrian Sophi”) in John Milton’s “Paradise Lost”. The political history of his reign is characterized by petty intrigues.

However, its art history, especially the arts of the book, is rich and compelling. During his reign, Qazvin was chosen has a capital as being a less vulnerable city compared to Tabriz, the first capital of Safavids. The decade after Tahmasp’s death (he was poisoned by one of his wives) was characterized by political turbulence. After endless plotting and several assassination his fourth son ascended the throne as Ismail II. Ismail had been held in prison by his father for twenty-five years. Demented by incarceration and an eventually fatal drug addiction, he began his reign by extirpating his rivals. He ordered that his brother, the purblind and seemingly innocuous Mohammad Khodabandeh, and Mohammad’s young son Abbas be assassinated.

However, before this order could be carried out, Ismail suddenly died, perhaps of drink and an overdose of opium. Some authorities, however, say that he was assassinated by a conspiracy of dissident feudal chiefs. His successor, the feeble Mohammad Khodabandeh, ruled only in name. For two years, his energetic wife tried to bring the Shah’s vassals under control. When she proved too threatening, the vassals murdered her, and for eight years Iran was dismembered in bitter, fratricidal feuds.

The Safavid state was saved by Mohammad’s son, Shah Abbas I, who is better known Iranian historical tradition as Shah Abbas the Great. This shah started by signing a largely disadvantageous treaty with the Ottomans. This treaty, however allowed him to gain breathing space to confront and defeat the Uzbeks. With the advice of Robed Shirley, and English adventurer versed in artillery tactics, he organized the army and equipped it on European lines. He then fought several successful battles with the Ottomans, reestablishing Iranian control over lraq, Georgia and parts of the Caucasus. He also strengthened the bureaucracy and further centralized the administration.

Shah Abbas transferred the capital from Qazvin to Isfahan, a centrally located city, from where he could control his vast territory more successfully. This monarch, a contemporary of King James I of England and King Henry IV of France, was not only great as a warrior and administrator, but he also fostered a renaissance of art. The period of his reign brought forth the golden age of Isfahan, which was turned into one of the most beautiful cities of the world, worthy of its title “half the world”.

Under Abbas’s patronage, carpet weaving became a major industry, and fine Persian rugs appeared in the homes of wealthy Europeans. Another profitable export was textiles, including brocades and damasks of unparalleled richness. The production and sale of silk was made a monopoly of the crown. In the illumination of manuscripts, bookbinding, and ceramics, the work of this period is outstanding. In painting, it is the most notable in Persian history. Shah Abbas was a patron of science and scientific achievements as well. Some of the greatest philosophers of Iran lived under his rule, among them Molla Ṣadra, Mir Damad, and Moqaddas Ardabili.

Shah Abbas’s enthusiasm for building was not confined to Isfahan. The extension and restoration of the famous shrine of Imam Reza in Mashhad and the construction, along the swampy littoral of the Caspian Sea, of the celebrated stone were among his other notable achievements. There is hardly a part of Iran where either Safavid buildings or major Safavid restorations can not be found.

The dynasty spent a great deal of money and effort on the building of bridges, roads, and caravansaries to courage trade. To facilitate commerce and find a way to southern seas, Shah Abbas expelled the Portuguese, who had previously occupied d Bahrain and the island of Hormuz, trying to dominate in the Indian Ocean and Persian Gulf trade. He also freed and expanded the port that became known as Bandar Abbas, which is functioning even now. After Shah Abbas, the centralized rule started to decline. It is partly surprising that Chardin saw Shah Abbas’s reign as the golden age of Iran. “When this great prince ceased to live”, he wrote, “Persia ceased to prosper” and indeed, the Safavid state never achieved the degree of political and military power, economic prosperity, internal stability and security and artistic distinction that it had under Shah Abbas.

Of Shah Abbas’s successors, only Abbas II, the great grandson of his namesake, interrupted the steady decline of the dynasty. He was crowned at a very age and thus successfully escaped the seclusion of the harem, which may well be the reason why he developed more favorably than the other of Shah Abbas’s successors. Although inclined to lose control under the influenced of alcohol and narcotics, he was more gifted than any other descendant of Shah Abbas the Great, and history records him as a just ruler and an intelligent patron of arts. Abbas II died in 1666 at the age of thirty-three. Abbas’s eighteen-year-old son ascended the throne as Shah Safi. However, shortly after his accession, the shah fell ill. The doctors ascribed his illness to the miscasting of his horoscope at the time of his accession. Therefore on a day proclaimed by the astrologers as unlucky, a mock coronation of a Zoroastrian was performed. The following day, allegedly a lucky one, an effigy of the Zoroastrian was decapitated, and Shah Safi reassumed his throne as Shah Soleyman. Soleyman’s harem upbringing had left him under the thumb of the eunuchs. Like most of the Safavid rulers, he cared more about women and wine than his country.

Chardin reported that he could drink any Swiss or German under the table. The Soleyman’s reign was for the most part Peaceful, though it was not the ruler’s merit but rather a fortunate culmination of circumstances.

The last ruling Safavid Shah was Shah Sultan Hossein. In character, he was pious, humane, and feeble. His piety earned him the nicknames of “Molla Hossein” and “Yashki dir” (Turkish: “It is good”), the second deriving from his invariable reply of assent to every proposal made by the clergy. His feebleness accelerated the decline of the country. Once again the eastern frontiers began to be breached, and a small body of Afghan tribesmen led by Mahmud, a former Safavid vassal in Afghanistan, won a series of easy victories before taking the capital. Although the Safavid dynasty claimed rule for many years, bearing illustrious but hollow names like Tahmasp II and Abbas III, the glory of the Safavid reign was never re-established.


- Beheshti, Oksana (2003). Travel guide to Isfahan, Kashan and more. Iran. Tehran. Rozaneh publication. P. 21-33

Visitors` Statistics
 Visitors of page : 1436
 Visitors of day : 290
 Visitors sum : 616082
 Online visitors : 2
 Page load : 6.0683